Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Apologies for the late response
I really have no idea what to make of this story. I find it bizarre yet intriguing. I really want to know what others are thinking about this story (and I'm going to read the other posts after this), because I think it is so open to interpretation. If I had to throw something out there (which I do), I would say that this was some Romantic fairy tale gone terribly wrong. Other Romantic tales we have read have definitely used nature, but this one takes it a step further by actually mating a rose with a woman, and creating a daughter/rose child. The rose/woman description has been made before in many stories I have read, but it has never been as literal as it is in this story. I also thought it was interesting that the story takes a turn in tone at the end. It goes from sort of a mystical tale to a comedic, slightly sarcastic joke. This change, when the narrator talks in jest about Dr. Rosenberger perhaps conducting "bestial experiments" on the girl, is a strange way to end the story, as it sort of leaves the reader very confused as to what the moral of the story (if any) may be. I am open to all other interpretations, and look forward to hearing some of them in class tomorrow.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Haha, "leaves" the reader. Yeah, isn't it funny that the Dr. Rosenberger is blamed for bestial experiments, when really it's the actual flower that committed the crimes?
ReplyDelete